Our model was closer to the result by 3.8% (assigned 88.5% on the actual outcome vs market 75.0%).
Stand Out Games
Value pick performance (finished games)
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 88.9% on the actual outcome vs market 75.6%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.9% (market 15.0% on actual outcome vs our 6.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 89.0% on the actual outcome vs market 75.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.7% (assigned 89.0% on the actual outcome vs market 75.8%).
Market was closer to the result by 18.5% (market 16.4% on actual outcome vs our 7.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.1% on the actual outcome vs market 75.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 89.1% on the actual outcome vs market 76.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.2% on the actual outcome vs market 76.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.2% on the actual outcome vs market 76.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.3% on the actual outcome vs market 76.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.3% on the actual outcome vs market 76.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.4% (assigned 89.4% on the actual outcome vs market 76.5%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.8% on the actual outcome vs market 77.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.8% on the actual outcome vs market 77.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.9% on the actual outcome vs market 77.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.1%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.7% (market 15.0% on actual outcome vs our 6.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.7%).
Market was closer to the result by 20.7% (market 21.5% on actual outcome vs our 9.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.4% on the actual outcome vs market 78.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.4% on the actual outcome vs market 78.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.5% on the actual outcome vs market 78.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.5% on the actual outcome vs market 78.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.9% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.5%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.5% (market 14.7% on actual outcome vs our 6.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.9% (assigned 90.8% on the actual outcome vs market 78.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.8% (assigned 90.9% on the actual outcome vs market 78.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.7% (assigned 91.1% on the actual outcome vs market 79.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.7% (assigned 91.1% on the actual outcome vs market 79.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.8% (assigned 91.3% on the actual outcome vs market 79.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.6% (assigned 91.5% on the actual outcome vs market 79.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.5% (assigned 91.8% on the actual outcome vs market 80.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.4% (assigned 91.8% on the actual outcome vs market 80.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.5% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 80.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.3% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.3% (assigned 92.3% on the actual outcome vs market 81.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.5% on the actual outcome vs market 81.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.5% on the actual outcome vs market 81.8%).
Market was closer to the result by 15.5% (market 11.7% on actual outcome vs our 4.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.7% on the actual outcome vs market 82.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.7% on the actual outcome vs market 82.2%).
Our content is provided for informational purposes only we do not offer betting advice and accept no responsibility for any betting decisions or losses.
Live Profit Progression
Cumulative flat-stake performance across finished value picks.
No finished value-pick data available yet.
Full History Log
| Date | Match | Selection | Odds | Outcome |
|---|
No data found
